Christianity loves to tie its own 'new covenant' back to Jeremiah 31, but will almost never tie it back to where it originated, in Deuteronomy 30. Why? Could it be because it doesn't fit modern Christian doctrine?

If there is a verse right smack in the middle of prophecy that you yourself embrace, and that prophecy gives DIGNITY and HONOR and RELEVANCE to the Law of Moses, then why would you call it 'bondage' and a 'shadow' and a 'curse'? Should we 'remember' the Law of Moses? Or forget it?

If a prophecy exists that includes miracles that surpass those seen in the days of Moses, why isn't every preacher on every street corner talking about it??

Paul confidently references a prophecy that seemingly doesn't exist. Can you find it? Or was Paul just bluffing hoping those at Corinth would just take his word for it?