Paul pretends to quote Psalm 14, but then intentionally misrepresents the meaning as presented by the psalmist. Why are you okay with that? Why does this deception serve as plank-one for salvation? Why are you not angry at Paul for misquoting my God?

Why does the modern church insist Paul and Jerusalem taught the same thing when it's EASILY demonstrated, not only were they at odds, but they spent decades mostly unaware of each other? Why is the church unwilling to recognize the nature of these differences? Why is Paul's doctrine held above everyone else's, including Jesus and those he ordained?

We can receive no greater gift than a relationship with God. Romans 5:6-11,18-21

Do you join with Paul, accusing that God gave his instructions to people that despised them and had no intention of following them? Or do you embrace what Moses said, that he gave them so that men that love him and his instructions can succeed and thrive?

Why is Paul esteemed a worthy student of Gamalial when everything Paul did AS his student was seemingly an effort to undermine Gamaliel's wishes?

If Jesus really did SANCTIFY his twelve apostles with anointing for the 'Great Commission', then why did Paul have such contempt for them insisting he learned nothing from them?

Paul confidently references a prophecy that seemingly doesn't exist. Can you find it? Or was Paul just bluffing hoping those at Corinth would just take his word for it?

What's the straight answer? How is one justified? Faith only as Paul says? Or by works as James says? Does the TRADITION of Infallibility obligate you proclaim these two doctrines as identical even though we can clearly see they're not?

Why is the 'confess with thy mouth' approach to salvation most often used when Jesus directly refutes it? When Jesus specified the qualifications much more restrictive, was he misinformed? Was he less qualified on the subject than Paul?

Did MY GOD bring our people out in the middle of the desert to TRAP them in bondage while saying he did the opposite? Do you stand by Paul in this accusation?

On the twelve foundations in heaven, whose name occupies the twelve-spot? Mathias as selected by the twelve? Or Paul as selected by 'Christ' in the spirit world, who communicates his appointment exclusively to him?

Why does Paul practice fund raising like a TV evangelist when Jesus prohibits it? Why was there one set of rules for twelve apostles, and another set of rules for the self-appointed thirteenth one?

Was Paul actually raising and delegating significant amounts of funding like an evangelist today does? Or was he poor as a potbelly stove?

Did the original church have official endorsed writings? Sadly, the answer by most preachers is “no”. They will recount that “canon of scripture” was established much later. However, there was an early document that received endorsement, but often does not get the recognition it deserves. The history of this document exists today in your own bible for anyone who cares to look. The Council at Jerusalem A meeting took place between Paul and the Jerusalem church in approximately 50 A.